Research Article

Factors Influencing Distraction Among EFL College Students: The Role of Gender and Academic Year

Xiao-Xuan Lin 1, Ruei-Teng Hung 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Applied English, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations, 5(3), September 2025, 25-34, https://doi.org/10.35745/ijssai2025v05.03.0014
Submitted: 29 May 2025, Published: 30 September 2025
OPEN ACCESS   13 Views   9 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the factors that influence students to be distracted during class in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) class rooms, along with differences by gender and academic year. Ninety-nine EFL college students completed a questionnaire covering four categories: Technology and Multitasking, Environmental and External Distractions, Course Content and Teaching Methods, and Learning Motivation and Psychological Factors. The results showed that female students reported slightly higher distraction levels overall, especially related to multitasking behaviors, while senior students were less affected by environmental disruptions. Among female students, the highest distraction was observed in Category 2, while the lowest was in Category 4 (M = 3.27). The results suggest that classroom distraction is a complex issue requiring thoughtful, flexible solutions. These findings highlight the importance of developing targeted strategies to reduce distraction and support student focus in technology-enhanced classroom settings, where managing attention has become increasingly challenging.

CITATION (APA)

Lin, X.-X., & Hung, R.-T. (2025). Factors Influencing Distraction Among EFL College Students: The Role of Gender and Academic Year. International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations, 5(3), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.35745/ijssai2025v05.03.0014

REFERENCES

  1. Agingu, E.A., Owaa, J.A., & Raburu, P. (2022). Relationship between Distraction and Academic Adjustment among First-Year Undergraduate Students in Public Universities in Kenya. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2), 127–141.
  2. Aivaz, K.A., & Teodorescu, D. (2022). College Students’ Distractions from Learning Caused by Multitasking in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classes: A Case Study at a Public University in Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11188.
  3. Bang, H., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2024). The impact of course content and teaching methods on student engagement in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(3), 450–465.
  4. Borup, J., Graham, C.R., West, R.E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K.J. (2020). Academic Communities of Engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807–832.
  5. Bunce, D.M., Flens, E.A., & Neiles, K.Y. (2010). How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1438–1443.
  6. Flanigan, A.E., & Babchuk, W.A. (2022). Digital distraction in the classroom: Exploring instructor perceptions and reactions. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 352–370.
  7. Flanigan, A.E., Brady, A.C., Dai, Y., & Ray, E. (2023a). Managing Student Digital Distraction in the College Classroom: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 60.
  8. Flanigan, A.E., Hosek, A.M., Frisby, B., Babchuk, W.A., & Ray, E. (2023b). Student perceptions of digital distraction prevention and student-instructor rapport. Communication Education, 72(3), 217–236.
  9. Iluzada, C.L., Wakefield, R.L., & Alford, A.M. (2022). Personal Technology in the Classroom: Evaluating Student Learning, Attention, and Satisfaction. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 4(3), 111–131.
  10. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
  11. Kheder, K., & Rouabhia, R. (2023). Gender Differences in Learning Languages. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 6(2), 1–15.
  12. Kilian, B., Hofer, M., & Kuhnle, C. (2010). The role of motivation and self-regulation in student distraction. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 317–325.
  13. Laoli, A., Waruwu, E., Ndraha, A.B., & Zebua, D.I. (2023). Gender differences in college students’ achievement in teaching English as a foreign language using inquiry-based learning. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(4), 666–673.
  14. Le, H.V. (2021). An Investigation into Factors Affecting Concentration of University Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(6), 7–12.
  15. Liao, C.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2022). Deploying multimodal learning analytics models to explore the impact of digital distraction and peer learning on student performance. Computers & Education, 190, 104599.
  16. Ober, T.M., Brodsky, J.E., Yannaco, F.D., & Brooks, P.J. (2023). College instructors’ and students’ views of personal mobile device use (and misuse). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 9(1), 14–37.
  17. Pérez-Juárez, M.Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J.M. (2023). Digital Distractions from the Point of View of Higher Education Students. Sustainability, 15(7), 6044.
  18. Rummel, J., Wöstenfeld, F.O., Steindorf, L., & Röer, J.P. (2024). Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 165–181.
  19. Schwartz, L.A., Geier, M.T., & Stowe, K. (2021). Understanding distractors in a business technology classroom. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 25, 1–15.
  20. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J.W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958.
  21. Sun, J.C.-Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers & Education, 72, 80–89.
  22. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312.
  23. Tran, V.D. (2015). Predicting Student Misbehavior, Responsibility, and Distraction from Schoolwork from Classroom Management Techniques: The Students’ Views. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 178–189.