Research Article

Leveraging AI for Teacher Support: Integrating AI-Driven Tools in Writing Instruction to Enhance Pedagogical Strategies

Miao-Shan Lin 1 * , Ruei-Teng Hung 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Applied English, Chaoyung University of Technology, Taichung 41300, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations, 5(4), December 2025, 17-24, https://doi.org/10.35745/ijssai2025v05.04.0018
Submitted: 11 September 2024, Published: 30 December 2025
OPEN ACCESS   56 Views   69 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study examines the factors that influence students' acceptance and preference for Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tools and how these tools affect their writing performance. Fifty second-year English majors were surveyed regarding their utilization of seven Automated Writing Enhancement (AWE) tools: QuillBot, Scribens, Language Tool, Reverso, OnlineCorrection.com, ProwritingAid, and Grammarly. The results suggest that familiarity, user experience, and functionality significantly impact acceptance. Grammarly was widely embraced as the most favored tool, whereas Reverso faced the least acceptance primarily because of its intricate interface. The key determinants impacting students' choice of tools were the inclusion of extensive features and user-friendly interfaces. The study emphasizes the advantages of AWE tools in enhancing writing abilities and alleviating writing apprehension while also suggesting possible disadvantages, such as excessive dependence on technology. These observations emphasize the significance of incorporating AWE (Automated Writing Evaluation) tools into writing instruction to improve student learning outcomes.
Keywords: AWE tools, Student acceptance, User preference, Writing improvement, Educational technology

CITATION (APA)

Lin, M.-S., & Hung, R.-T. (2025). Leveraging AI for Teacher Support: Integrating AI-Driven Tools in Writing Instruction to Enhance Pedagogical Strategies. International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations, 5(4), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.35745/ijssai2025v05.04.0018

REFERENCES

  1. Ajabshir, Z.F., & Ebadi, S. (2023). The effects of automatic writing evaluation and teacher-focused feedback on CALF measures and overall quality of L2 writing across different genres. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 26.
  2. Dewi, U. (2022). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students’ perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161.
  3. Fitria, T.N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 183–196.
  4. Heintz, K., Roh, Y., & Lee, J. (2022). Comparing the accuracy and effectiveness of Wordvice AI Proofreader to two automated editing tools and human editors. Science Editing, 9(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.261
  5. Kurniati, E.Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of Quillbot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437–451.
  6. Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
  7. Li, Z. (2021). Teachers in automated writing evaluation (AWE) system-supported ESL writing classes: Perception, implementation, and influence. System, 99, 102505.
  8. Mat, A.C., Zulkornain, L.H., & Rahman, N.A.A. (2024). Automated Writing Evaluation: Users’ Perception and Expectations. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 183–192.
  9. Parra, G.L., & Calero, S.X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209–226.
  10. Roscoe, R.D., Wilson, J., Johnson, A.C., & Mayra, C.R. (2017). Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 207–221.
  11. Sari, E., & Han, T. (2024). The impact of automated writing evaluation on English as a foreign language learners’ writing self‐efficacy, self‐regulation, anxiety, and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 1616–1631.
  12. Shadiev, R., & Feng, Y. (2024). Using automated corrective feedback tools in language learning: A review study. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2538–2566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2153145
  13. Sybing, R. (2021). Examining dialogic opportunities in teacher-student interaction: An ethnographic observation of the language classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100492.
  14. Waer, H. (2023). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 47–71.
  15. Wang, Y., Luo, X., Liu, C.-C., Tu, Y.-F., & Wang, N. (2022). An integrated automatic writing evaluation and SVVR approach to improve students’ EFL writing performance. Sustainability, 14(18), 11586.
  16. Wei, P., Wang, X.S., & Dong, H. (2023). The impact of automated writing evaluation on second language writing skills of Chinese EFL learners: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1249991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249991
  17. Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94–109.
  18. Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R.D. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87–125.
  19. Wilson, J., Zhang, F., Palermo, C., Cordero, T.C., Myers, M.C., Eacker, H., Potter, A., & Coles, J. (2024). Predictors of middle school students’ perceptions of automated writing evaluation. Computers & Education, 211, 104985.
  20. Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2817–2842.
  21. Zhang, Z.V. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, 100439.